Digital technology as a boundary object for making sense of time and temporality in hybrid work.
Griva, A., Chandra Kruse, L., Hattinger, M., Högberg, K., Pappas, I. O., & Conboy, K. (2024). Making space for time: Strategies for the design of time‐aware hybrid work. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12552
Five principles that help us develop situated explanations.
Grisold, T., Kremser, W., Mendling, J., Recker, J., Vom Brocke, J., & Wurm, B. (2024). Generating impactful situated explanations through digital trace data. Journal of Information Technology, 39(1), 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231208724
Building muscle from experiences with confronting crises.
Tremblay, M. C., Kohli, R., & Rivero, C. (2023). ‘Data is the New Protein: How the Commonwealth of Virginia Built Digital Resilience Muscle and Rebounded from Opioid and COVID Shocks’, MIS Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 423-449. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/17260
Doing the right thing can result in bad experiences; doing the wrong thing can result in good experiences.
Balozian, P., Burns, A. J., & Leidner, D. E. (2023). ‘An Adversarial Dance: Toward an Understanding of Insiders’ Responses to Organizational Information Security Measures’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 161-221. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00798
Two excellent papers from ACIS 2022 in Melbourne, Australia.
Rinaudo, N. B., Matook, S., & Dennis, A. R. (2022). ‘Social Media’s Stockholm Syndrome: A Literature Review of User’s Love and Hate’, paper presented at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Melbourne (Australia), paper 127.
Hannon, O., Gal, U., & Dar-Nimrod, I. (2022). ‘Aversion vs. Abstinence: Conceptual Distinctions for the Receptivity Toward Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems Within Value-laden Contexts’, paper presented at the Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS), Melbourne (Australia), paper 77.
People often have rational justifications for why they don’t follow the cybersecurity policies.
Karjalainen M., Sarker S., & Siponen M. (2019), ‘Toward a Theory of Information Systems Security Behaviors of Organizational Employees: A Dialectical Process Perspective’, Information Systems Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 687-704, https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0827
Great outcomes aren’t exclusive to shiny new objects.
Paavola L. & Cuthbertson R. (2022), ‘Transformative Power of Mundane Technologies in Institutional Change’, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.868
Everything we know about dynamic capabilities and IS research as of 2022.
Mikalef P., Pateli A. & Ortiz-de-Guinea A. (2022), ‘Dynamic Capabilities in Information Systems Research: A Critical Review, Synthesis of Current Knowledge, and Recommendations for Future Research’, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00736
What do we know about interoperability in the age of digital platforms and ecosystems?
Hodapp D. & Hanelt A. (2022), ‘Interoperability in the Era of Digital Innovation: An Information Systems Research Agenda’, Journal of Information Technology, https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211064304
It’s a little bit more complicated than the good ol’ triple-constraint model.
Iivari J. (2021), ‘A Paradox Lens to Systems Development Projects: The Case of the Agile Software Development’, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 49, https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04901